Now onboarding solo GPs and angels
No associate to take the first pass. No partner to split the judgment call with. OnThesis reads every cold pitch against your actual thesis and only hands you what's worth your time.
No spam. One email when we're ready for you.
The part nobody puts in the pitch deck

You know most of what's in it before you open it — wrong stage, wrong check size, a sector you don't touch. Roughly 70 out of every 100 pitches die in that first look, before anyone takes a meeting. Never a judgment call about the company. A mismatch you could've caught in a sentence.
There's no associate doing that first pass, no principal filtering before it reaches you. A solo GP fielding even a modest run of cold pitches a week is looking at somewhere north of two thousand a year — thirty honest seconds each, several hundred hours spent finding the two or three that were ever going anywhere. Triaged at 11pm, between calls, or not at all for three days. You just don't know which one was worth it until you've already spent the time.
of pitches die in the first look, before any meeting — a mismatch, not a rejection
median close rate across a full year of deal flow at a typical fund
better conversion for a warm intro than a cold pitch, meeting for meeting
Before anything else
Nobody made you build a fund of one. You did it because you didn't want a committee between you and a decision. You wanted the calls to be yours — the good ones and the wrong ones both.
That's not a gap in the model. It's the model. But it means every hour spent scanning something that was never going to be a fit is an hour that came out of the part of the job you actually chose this for.
This isn't about needing help running a fund. It's about one specific, repetitive task that doesn't deserve the same hours as everything else you're doing alone.
How it works
A cold email hits your existing inbox — Gmail or Outlook. Nothing changes about how founders reach you.
OnThesis parses the email body, attached decks, and DocSend links — stage, sector, check size, traction — and checks it against your actual criteria.
Clear mismatches get a drafted pass, queued for your one-click approval. Borderline cases get flagged, not buried. Nothing sends without you.
What clears the bar shows up with a one-line summary pinned in your inbox. That's the only thing you actually have to read.
Built for how you actually screen
Not a CRM. Not a form founders have to find. It reads what's already landing in your inbox and applies the same fit check you'd apply yourself.
Set your stage, sector, geography, check size, and ownership targets once. Every pitch gets checked against the real thing, not a generic spam filter.
Pulls metrics straight out of attached PDFs and linked DocSend or Notion decks — pre-seed, $500k raise, $10k MRR — without you opening a single attachment.
Off-thesis pitches get a polite, specific, auto-tailored pass drafted and queued. You approve or edit before anything sends. Never fully autonomous by default.
If the sender shares a mutual connection or was referred in, triage backs off. Warm intros don't get auto-passed just because the metrics look off.
Cross-references inbound against your existing portfolio, so direct competitors get flagged before you accidentally take the meeting.
A standing rollup of what got auto-passed and why, so you can spot-check the system's calls instead of trusting it blind.
Who this is for
You're running LP capital with no associate to take the first pass. You already know warm intros close several times better than cold ones — that instinct is correct, and it's exactly what a bigger fund's screening layer protects at scale. OnThesis gives you that same protection without giving up the autonomy you built this to have.
It's your own capital and your own time — nobody else is losing sleep over a wasted scan. But you still know the next great cold pitch might be sitting three emails deep in a pile you haven't opened yet, and that not opening it isn't a small thing to you either.
Questions
It's the same judgment call you already make on every pitch — does this match my stage, sector, geography, check size, and the things I actually care about. OnThesis just applies that check before you have to read the email to make it.
OnThesis connects via the Gmail or Outlook API to read inbound mail matching your public contact address and take the actions you've approved — sorting, summarizing, drafting passes. It's scoped access, not a full mailbox export, and nothing sends without your review unless you explicitly turn on auto-send for a given confidence tier.
No. OnThesis sits upstream of Affinity, Attio, Streak, or whatever you already use. It filters before a deal is worth logging, then hands off what's on-thesis so you're not manually filing noise into a system built for tracking real relationships.
Not by default. Drafted passes queue for your one-click approval. Full auto-send is something you can opt into later, per confidence tier, once you trust the calls it's making — not a v1 default.
Yes, both are supported through their respective APIs. Setup is the same regardless of which you use.
We're onboarding solo GPs and angels in small batches. Join the waitlist and you'll hear from us directly when a spot opens — no mass launch, no waiting in a generic queue.
Pricing isn't final while we're still in early access. Waitlist members get first access and founding pricing before any public rate is set.
Because the odds are long, not zero. Warm intros convert several times better and should stay your primary channel — but real deals still start cold, often enough that the most successful investors keep reading them anyway. OnThesis isn't built to close the channel. It's built so scanning it doesn't cost you the hours it currently does.